← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Jeffers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.3674 0.3928 1.0555 1.1283
2017-18 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 56 13 14 27 0.482 0.1771 0.1806 0.5089 0.5189
2018-19 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 60 25 27 52 0.867 0.3184 0.3104 0.9148 0.8918
2019-20 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 48 23 34 57 1.188 0.4363 0.4363 1.2534 1.2534
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Lindenwood D1 CCHA 26 9 8 17 0.654
2022-23 Lindenwood D1 CCHA 28 7 13 20 0.714
2020-21 American International D1 AHA FR 6 1 0 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · American International
-24.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10740
Forward overall
#482
Forward born in 1999
#285
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2018-19
1.179 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2003-04
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.