← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mick Heneghan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 NAHL 28 1 1 2 0.071 0.0254 0.0261 0.0753 0.0773
2018-19 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 50 9 25 34 0.680 0.1571 0.1534 0.5479 0.5351
2019-20 Northeast Generals NAHL 48 3 34 37 0.771 0.2739 0.2739 0.8130 0.8130
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 24 5 12 17 0.708
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 30 4 16 20 0.667
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 20 0 7 7 0.350
2020-21 Alabama-Huntsville D1 13 1 3 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2020-21 · Alabama-Huntsville
+218.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4037
Defenseman overall
#958
Defenseman born in 1999
#1194
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2014-15
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2010-11
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.