IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mick Heneghan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — NAHL 28 1 1 2 0.071 0.0262 0.0269 0.0754 0.0774
2018-19 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 50 9 25 34 0.680 0.2772 0.2707 0.5466 0.5339
2019-20 Northeast Generals NAHL 48 3 34 37 0.771 0.2832 0.2832 0.8136 0.8136
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 24 5 12 17 0.708
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 30 4 16 20 0.667
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 20 0 7 7 0.350
2020-21 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — — 13 1 3 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2020-21 · Alabama-Huntsville
+88.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3689
Defenseman overall
#867
Defenseman born in 1999
#1059
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeffrey Gratz
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Vinny Post
Adrian · 2014-15
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Taje
Lake Forest · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.