← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Fisher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.1585 0.1668 0.4200 0.4419
2018-19 NAHL 18 0 3 3 0.167 0.0660 0.0665 0.1750 0.1763
2019-20 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 45 8 14 22 0.489 0.1720 0.1720 0.2397 0.2397
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 14 1 1 2 0.143
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 15 0 4 4 0.267
2020-21 St. Scholastica D1 FR 14 1 1 2 0.143
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 FR 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2020-21 · St. Scholastica
+42.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13067
Defenseman overall
#2309
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.