IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Christianson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 61 10 12 22 0.361 0.0981 0.1028 0.2273 0.2383
2011-12 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 22 3 4 7 0.318 0.0865 0.0863 0.2005 0.2001
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 27 6 3 9 0.333
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 2 5 7 0.269
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 26 3 7 10 0.385
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 8 6 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2013-14 · Concordia
+604.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#48526
Forward overall
#1850
Forward born in 1992
#1603
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Rigtrup
St. Michael's College · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Lang
Saint Anselm · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Sampson
Marian · 2017-18
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.