IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Outzen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 54 14 17 31 0.574 0.2109 0.2115 0.6068 0.6085
2019-20 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 52 19 38 57 1.096 0.4027 0.4027 1.1586 1.1586
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 16 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 16 0 1 1 0.062
2021-22 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 24 1 0 1 0.042
2020-21 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12101
Forward overall
#550
Forward born in 1999
#401
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Daniels
Westfield State · 2013-14
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Donovan Powell
Buffalo State · 2022-23
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Porrier
Johnson & Wales · 2009-10
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.