IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Slaggert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-25 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #79  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — NTDP-U18 51 10 14 24 0.471 0.3498 0.3608 1.7515 1.8068
2019-20 — NTDP-U18 47 13 11 24 0.511 0.3795 0.3795 1.9004 1.9004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 36 20 11 31 0.861
2022-23 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 35 7 6 13 0.371
2021-22 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 40 12 14 26 0.650
2020-21 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 25 8 14 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2020-21 · Notre Dame
+185.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Joe Wegwerth
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Larkin
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Michigan (1.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Chris Wilkie
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Anders Bjork
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Tuch
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gage Dill
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Kennedy
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.