IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakob Breault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-10-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 51 24 33 57 1.118 0.2863 0.2886 0.8283 0.8350
2019-20 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 51 18 37 55 1.078 0.3830 0.3830 1.1322 1.1322
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC — 31 17 20 37 1.194
2023-24 Utica D3 UCHC — 27 11 19 30 1.111
2022-23 Utica D3 UCHC — 23 11 13 24 1.044
2021-22 Alaska Fairbanks D1 — — 18 3 1 4 0.222
2020-21 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9205
Forward overall
#406
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Howie
Marian · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Humphrey
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hall
New England College · 2017-18
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.