IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Manzo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — NAHL 34 2 2 4 0.118 0.0437 0.0437 0.1245 0.1245
2020-21 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 45 6 4 10 0.222 0.0825 0.0825 0.2353 0.2353
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 50 6 19 25 0.500 0.1857 0.1792 0.5294 0.5109
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 24 4 11 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2022-23 · UMass Boston
+307.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33408
Forward overall
#1400
Forward born in 2001
#4140
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexander Laseen
Curry · 2006-07
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Melso
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Damien Kulynych
Fredonia · 2013-14
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.