IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Szeremley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 45 0 8 8 0.178 0.0456 0.0482 0.1338 0.1414
2018-19 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 43 3 12 15 0.349 0.0894 0.0898 0.2624 0.2637
2019-20 Winkler Flyers MJHL 47 8 14 22 0.468 0.0901 0.0901 0.2949 0.2949
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 27 4 12 16 0.593
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 25 0 6 6 0.240
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 21 0 3 3 0.143
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16428
Defenseman overall
#2666
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustav Lindgren
Lawrence · 2010-11
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Moccia
Connecticut College · 2018-19
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Todd Bannerman
Southern Maine · 2011-12
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.