IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Moccia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 44 17 35 52 1.182 0.4159 0.4223 0.5794 0.5883
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 23 7 7 14 0.609
2021-22 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 5 3 1 4 0.800
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2019-20 · Connecticut College
-38.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8096
Forward overall
#350
Forward born in 1999
#71
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Logan Nelson
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sam Rothstein
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Eppright
New England · 2015-16
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Smith
Southern New Hampshire · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.