IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank Vitucci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wellington Dukes OJHL 51 19 22 41 0.804 0.1970 0.1923 0.5533 0.5401
2019-20 Wellington Dukes OJHL 54 36 31 67 1.241 0.3041 0.3041 0.8540 0.8540
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Stevenson D3 MAC — 28 10 10 20 0.714
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC — 26 7 13 20 0.769
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC — 26 12 7 19 0.731
2020-21 Alabama Huntsville D1 — FR 19 1 0 1 0.053
2020-21 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — FR 19 1 0 1 0.053
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2020-21 · Alabama Huntsville
-68.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14778
Forward overall
#702
Forward born in 1999
#452
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Flynn
Babson · 2015-16
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2013-14
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Logar
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.