← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chad Watt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 32 5 5 10 0.312 0.0722 0.0766 0.1529 0.1622
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 44 12 11 23 0.523 0.1207 0.1226 0.2558 0.2598
2017-18 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 44 22 26 48 1.091 0.1427 0.1345 0.3703 0.3490
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 24 9 8 17 0.708
2020-21 Stevenson D1 MAC JR 16 7 3 10 0.625
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 16 7 3 10 0.625
2019-20 Stevenson D1 MAC SO 28 8 3 11 0.393
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 28 8 3 11 0.393
2018-19 Stevenson D1 MAC FR 23 2 3 5 0.217
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 23 2 3 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2018-19 · Stevenson
+95.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21912
Forward overall
#1001
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2017-18
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.