← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chad Watt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 32 5 5 10 0.312 0.0671 0.0712 0.1530 0.1623
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 44 12 11 23 0.523 0.1122 0.1139 0.2560 0.2600
2017-18 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 44 22 26 48 1.091 0.1468 0.1384 0.3713 0.3500
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 24 9 8 17 0.708
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 16 7 3 10 0.625
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 28 8 3 11 0.393
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 23 2 3 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2018-19 · Stevenson
+97.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34033
Forward overall
#1552
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2017-18
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.