IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Lange Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New England Wolves EHL 44 12 22 34 0.773 0.1658 0.1684 0.3784 0.3844
2017-18 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 33 13 29 42 1.273 0.2731 0.2622 0.6232 0.5984
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D3 — FR 11 2 1 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2018-19 · Bryn Athyn
+41.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16797
Forward overall
#689
Forward born in 1997
#100
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawson MacDougall
Hobart · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Brink
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stefano Alonzi
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.