IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emil Elias Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-29 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 40 17 19 36 0.900 0.2966 0.2956 0.3062 0.3051
2024-25 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 37 19 25 44 1.189 0.3920 0.3677 0.4046 0.3795
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 10 2 3 5 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · New England College
+72.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11494
Forward overall
#499
Forward born in 2004
#594
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Greco
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Mastay
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Gaulrapp
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.