← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Greco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-07-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Chicago Steel USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 51 7 21 28 0.549 0.2038 0.2114 0.5813 0.6031
2007-08 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 57 21 36 57 1.000 0.3713 0.3670 1.0588 1.0465
2008-09 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 52 19 26 45 0.865 0.3213 0.3016 0.9163 0.8602
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 26 14 14 28 1.077
2011-12 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 26 14 22 36 1.385
2010-11 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 22 16 13 29 1.318
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 FR 25 5 6 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+56.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9737
Forward overall
#448
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.