IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Greco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-07-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Chicago Steel USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 51 7 21 28 0.549 0.2017 0.2093 0.5795 0.6012
2007-08 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 57 21 36 57 1.000 0.3674 0.3631 1.0555 1.0432
2008-09 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 52 19 26 45 0.865 0.3179 0.2984 0.9134 0.8575
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 26 14 14 28 1.077
2011-12 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 26 14 22 36 1.385
2010-11 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 22 16 13 29 1.318
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 25 5 6 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+58.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13078
Forward overall
#510
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Krapian
Post · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Hoover
Lebanon Valley · 2022-23
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Martini
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.