| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Chicago Steel | USHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2006-07 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 51 | 7 | 21 | 28 | 0.549 | 0.2038 | 0.2114 | 0.5813 | 0.6031 |
| 2007-08 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 57 | 21 | 36 | 57 | 1.000 | 0.3713 | 0.3670 | 1.0588 | 1.0465 |
| 2008-09 | St. Louis Bandits | NAHL | 52 | 19 | 26 | 45 | 0.865 | 0.3213 | 0.3016 | 0.9163 | 0.8602 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Plymouth State | D3 | LittleEast | SR | 26 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 1.077 |
| 2011-12 | Plymouth State | D3 | LittleEast | JR | 26 | 14 | 22 | 36 | 1.385 |
| 2010-11 | Plymouth State | D3 | LittleEast | SO | 22 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 1.318 |
| 2009-10 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | — | FR | 25 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.440 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.