← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cornwall Colts CCHL 54 2 6 8 0.148 0.0321 0.0367 0.1146 0.1310
2018-19 Cornwall Colts CCHL 57 4 9 13 0.228 0.0495 0.0544 0.1765 0.1939
2019-20 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0459 0.0459 0.1319 0.1319
2020-21 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 53 8 5 13 0.245 0.0901 0.0901 0.2589 0.2589
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 58 15 22 37 0.638 0.2344 0.2273 0.6733 0.6529
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 15 1 0 1 0.067
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 16 0 1 1 0.062
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 20 3 2 5 0.250
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · UMass Lowell
-38.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34260
Forward overall
#1856
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.