IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cornwall Colts CCHL 54 2 6 8 0.148 0.0423 0.0483 0.1146 0.1310
2018-19 Cornwall Colts CCHL 57 4 9 13 0.228 0.0651 0.0715 0.1766 0.1940
2019-20 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0464 0.0464 0.1323 0.1323
2020-21 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 53 8 5 13 0.245 0.0911 0.0911 0.2597 0.2597
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 58 15 22 37 0.638 0.2369 0.2297 0.6754 0.6549
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 20 3 2 5 0.250
2006-07 Becker D3 — FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27400
Forward overall
#1073
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Penner
Concordia Wisconsin · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Haeg
St. John's · 2010-11
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Law
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.