IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott McKenzie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-15 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Carleton Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 19 1 1 2 0.105 0.0429 0.0471 0.9254 0.9917
2018-19 — AJHL 54 5 19 24 0.444 0.1491 0.1526 0.4112 0.4207
2019-20 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 56 14 28 42 0.750 0.1921 0.1921 0.5654 0.5654
2020-21 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 31 4 7 11 0.355 0.1304 0.1304 0.3745 0.3745
2022-23 Carleton Univ. USports-M 24 1 5 6 0.250 0.1319 0.1363 0.7328 0.7570
2023-24 Carleton Univ. USports-M 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.1172 0.1149 0.6513 0.6384
2024-25 Carleton Univ. USports-M 6 0 3 3 0.500 0.2638 0.2459 1.4655 1.3660
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hamilton D3 NESCAC — 19 3 8 11 0.579
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2021-22 · Hamilton
+512.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35149
Forward overall
#1840
Forward born in 2000

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.