| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | — | USHL | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.667 | 0.4246 | 0.4796 | 1.9979 | 2.2566 |
| 2019-20 | Maple Grove | USHS-MN | 7 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 2.571 | 0.6922 | 0.6922 | 0.6246 | 0.6246 |
| 2020-21 | — | NAHL | 19 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 0.842 | 0.3127 | 0.3127 | 0.8916 | 0.8916 |
| 2021-22 | — | USHL | 58 | 22 | 31 | 53 | 0.914 | 0.5819 | 0.5696 | 2.7384 | 2.6805 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | — | 28 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.214 |
| 2024-25 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | — | 37 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 0.513 |
| 2023-24 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | — | 27 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 0.444 |
| 2022-23 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | — | 39 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 0.692 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.