IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Calvin Hanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kittson County Central USHS-MN 25 42 28 70 2.800 0.3450 0.3450 0.6801 0.6801
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 53 10 23 33 0.623 0.2211 0.2257 0.6537 0.6673
2022-23 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 56 23 24 47 0.839 0.2981 0.2896 0.8812 0.8562
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA GR 31 17 13 30 0.968
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 7 10 17 0.548
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 27 5 8 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2023-24 · St. Norbert
+113.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8765
Forward overall
#409
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Warfield
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Frost
Nazareth · 2021-22
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.