IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Carr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-10-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Burlington Cougars OJHL 39 3 13 16 0.410 0.1006 0.1035 0.2825 0.2906
2009-10 Burlington Cougars OJHL 45 19 43 62 1.378 0.3377 0.3296 0.9486 0.9259
2010-11 Burlington Cougars OJHL 49 22 50 72 1.469 0.3601 0.3347 1.0117 0.9404
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 14 1 2 3 0.214
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 20 3 7 10 0.500
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 24 5 5 10 0.417
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 12 1 6 7 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2011-12 · SUNY Oswego
+104.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11505
Forward overall
#472
Forward born in 1990
#246
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Ehl
New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick DeSousa
Neumann · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tio D'Addario
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.