IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Glebs Prohorenkovs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-12 Country: Latvia
Signed Professionally
Dinamo Riga · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 HK Riga MHL-RU 28 2 6 8 0.286 0.1453 0.1453 0.7655 0.7655
2021-22 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 60 18 35 53 0.883 0.3245 0.3146 0.9323 0.9039
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA SR 36 1 16 17 0.472
2024-25 Niagara D1 AHA JR 37 9 22 31 0.838
2023-24 Niagara D1 AHA SO 39 9 12 21 0.538
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA FR 35 12 6 18 0.514
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2022-23 · Niagara
+91.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17207
Forward overall
#818
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitchell Herlihey
SUNY Oswego · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wil Munson
Nichols · 2006-07
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Boyd
Adrian · 2014-15
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.