IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 56 24 25 49 0.875 0.3467 0.3499 0.9187 0.9270
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 50 29 31 60 1.200 0.4754 0.4564 1.2599 1.2095
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC GR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 11 0 2 2 0.182
2023-24 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 7 1 1 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · Princeton
-19.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7841
Forward overall
#366
Forward born in 2002
#132
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michel Bond
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Eruzione
Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Mueller
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.