← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Mansfield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Toronto Patriots OJHL 50 10 22 32 0.640 0.1569 0.1569 0.4406 0.4406
2020-21 Toronto Patriots OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 56 12 20 32 0.571 0.2099 0.2151 0.6031 0.6182
2022-23 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 60 21 34 55 0.917 0.3368 0.3287 0.9676 0.9443
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA GR 5 2 0 2 0.400
2024-25 Bentley D1 AHA SR 31 8 10 18 0.581
2023-24 Bentley D1 AHA JR 31 7 11 18 0.581
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2023-24 · Bentley
+139.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17556
Forward overall
#924
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.