← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Mansfield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Toronto Patriots OJHL 50 10 22 32 0.640 0.1923 0.1923 0.4381 0.4381
2020-21 Toronto Patriots OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 56 12 20 32 0.571 0.2264 0.2321 0.5999 0.6149
2022-23 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 60 21 34 55 0.917 0.3632 0.3544 0.9624 0.9392
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA GR 5 2 0 2 0.400
2024-25 Bentley D1 AHA SR 31 8 10 18 0.581
2023-24 Bentley D1 AHA JR 31 7 11 18 0.581
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2023-24 · Bentley
+122.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17584
Forward overall
#935
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.