IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parks Wallace Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 50 2 5 7 0.140 0.0514 0.0516 0.1478 0.1485
2022-23 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 9 12 0.429
2024-25 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 9 12 0.429
2023-24 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 9 12 0.429
2022-23 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 9 12 0.429
2021-22 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 9 12 0.429
2020-21 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 28 3 9 12 0.429

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24877
Defenseman overall
#3730
Defenseman born in 2002
#6513
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe DiGiulio
Neumann · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence Cornellier
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Snider
Manhattanville · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.