← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe DiGiulio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 44 8 5 13 0.295 0.0387 0.0404 0.1003 0.1046
2018-19 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 43 9 7 16 0.372 0.0487 0.0482 0.1263 0.1250
2019-20 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 44 14 9 23 0.523 0.0684 0.0684 0.1774 0.1774
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Neumann D3 MAC SR 24 3 8 11 0.458
2022-23 Neumann D3 MAC JR 12 1 0 1 0.083
2021-22 Neumann D3 MAC SO 23 5 1 6 0.261
2020-21 Neumann D1 MAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38836
Forward overall
#2152
Forward born in 1999
#3531
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2022-23
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2016-17
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.