| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.1475 | 0.1617 | 0.7509 | 0.8231 |
| 2019-20 | Austin Bruins | NAHL | 51 | 11 | 23 | 34 | 0.667 | 0.2449 | 0.2449 | 1.0010 | 1.0010 |
| 2020-21 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 50 | 4 | 17 | 21 | 0.420 | 0.2478 | 0.2478 | 1.2614 | 1.2614 |
| 2021-22 | — | USHL | 48 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 0.542 | 0.3195 | 0.3021 | 1.6269 | 1.5384 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | SR | 37 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.540 |
| 2024-25 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | JR | 37 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 0.460 |
| 2023-24 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | SO | 38 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.421 |
| 2022-23 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | — | 38 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.316 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.