← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tiernan Shoudy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1537 0.1685 0.7366 0.8074
2019-20 Austin Bruins NAHL 51 11 23 34 0.667 0.2641 0.2641 0.9820 0.9820
2020-21 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 50 4 17 21 0.420 0.2582 0.2582 1.2374 1.2374
2021-22 USHL 48 12 14 26 0.542 0.3330 0.3149 1.5960 1.5092
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan D1 BigTen 37 7 13 20 0.540
2025-26 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 37 7 13 20 0.540
2024-25 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 37 8 9 17 0.460
2023-24 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 38 4 12 16 0.421
2022-23 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 38 6 6 12 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Michigan
+43.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16311
Forward overall
#871
Forward born in 2002
#1632
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.