IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-11-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Port Hope Predators OJHL 48 11 24 35 0.729 0.1787 0.1842 0.5021 0.5175
2007-08 Port Hope Predators OJHL 46 23 40 63 1.370 0.3357 0.3308 0.9430 0.9293
2008-09 Port Hope Predators OJHL 29 16 36 52 1.793 0.4395 0.4106 1.2345 1.1532
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 27 10 16 26 0.963
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 27 10 16 26 0.963
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 24 6 9 15 0.625
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 27 7 16 23 0.852
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2009-10 · St. Scholastica
+162.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8176
Forward overall
#335
Forward born in 1988
#93
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payden Benning
Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Imala
Fitchburg State · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.