IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Levi Kleiboer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-17 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Mount Royal Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0854 0.0977 0.2510 0.2871
2015-16 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 39 1 20 21 0.538 0.1380 0.1511 0.4055 0.4439
2016-17 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 55 3 29 32 0.582 0.1491 0.1558 0.4381 0.4578
2017-18 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 46 10 32 42 0.913 0.2339 0.2336 0.6875 0.6867
2018-19 Minot Minotauros NAHL 44 1 24 25 0.568 0.2088 0.1986 0.7502 0.6851
2021-22 Mount Royal Univ. USports-M 19 3 6 9 0.474 0.2499 0.2469 1.3881 1.3716
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 7 2 0 2 0.286
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 29 0 5 5 0.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2019-20 · Maine
-14.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4617
Defenseman overall
#1064
Defenseman born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.