| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Florida Jr. Blades | USPHL-Premier | 17 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 1.529 | 0.2000 | 0.2000 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Aurora Tigers | OJHL | 17 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.647 | 0.1586 | 0.1610 | 0.4455 | 0.4524 |
| 2022-23 | Corpus Christi IceRays | NAHL | 42 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.238 | 0.0875 | 0.0868 | 0.2513 | 0.2492 |
| 2023-24 | Corpus Christi IceRays | NAHL | 30 | 4 | 17 | 21 | 0.700 | 0.2572 | 0.2427 | 0.7389 | 0.6974 |
| 2025-26 | Univ. of British Columbia | USports-M | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.222 | 0.1172 | 0.1195 | 0.6513 | 0.6641 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Northern Michigan | D1 | CCHA | — | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.