IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Fensterstock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 39 8 27 35 0.897 0.3332 0.3535 — —
2019-20 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 17 2 6 8 0.471 0.2997 0.2997 1.4102 1.4102
2020-21 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 52 8 27 35 0.673 0.2499 0.2499 0.7127 0.7127
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 29 6 14 20 0.690
2023-24 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 20 8 5 13 0.650
2022-23 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 17 3 8 11 0.647
2021-22 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11633
Forward overall
#297
Forward born in 2000
#627
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.