IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Gangl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-08 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Toronto · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — CCHL 39 6 15 21 0.538 0.1168 0.1114 0.4166 0.3974
2022-23 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 53 12 30 42 0.792 0.1719 0.1563 0.6132 0.5575
2025-26 Univ. of Toronto USports-M 27 3 6 9 0.333 0.1758 0.1681 0.9769 0.9341
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Robert Morris D1 AHA — 4 0 1 1 0.250
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 AHA — 22 0 1 1 0.045
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2023-24 · Robert Morris
-65.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6724
Defenseman overall
#1624
Defenseman born in 2002

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2015-16
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2010-11
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.