← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Cafarelli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 33 1 4 5 0.151 0.0305 0.0305 0.0693 0.0693
2019-20 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 27 1 7 8 0.296 0.0596 0.0596 0.1355 0.1355
2021-22 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 46 4 8 12 0.261 0.1005 0.1024 0.3795 0.3868
2022-23 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 56 13 12 25 0.446 0.1640 0.1626 0.4718 0.4678
2023-24 — NAHL 59 20 25 45 0.763 0.2802 0.2645 0.8061 0.7608
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Endicott D3 CNE SO 23 12 3 15 0.652
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC — 15 1 6 7 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2024-25 · Utica
+143.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26049
Forward overall
#1461
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2018-19
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.