| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Cushing Academy | NE-Prep | 33 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.151 | 0.0291 | 0.0291 | 0.0690 | 0.0690 |
| 2019-20 | Lawrence Academy | NE-Prep | 27 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.296 | 0.0569 | 0.0569 | 0.1350 | 0.1350 |
| 2021-22 | Wenatchee Wild | BCHL | 46 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.261 | 0.1005 | 0.1024 | 0.3791 | 0.3864 |
| 2022-23 | Corpus Christi IceRays | NAHL | 56 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 0.446 | 0.1586 | 0.1573 | 0.4709 | 0.4669 |
| 2023-24 | — | NAHL | 59 | 20 | 25 | 45 | 0.763 | 0.2710 | 0.2558 | 0.8045 | 0.7593 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Endicott | D3 | CNE | — | 23 | 12 | 3 | 15 | 0.652 |
| 2024-25 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | — | 15 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.467 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.