IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Jasper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-18 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Regina · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1281 0.1281 0.3769 0.3769
2020-21 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.0854 0.0854 0.2512 0.2512
2021-22 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 51 2 26 28 0.549 0.1407 0.1466 0.4138 0.4312
2022-23 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 19 3 10 13 0.684 0.1317 0.1299 0.4315 0.4257
2023-24 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 44 2 24 26 0.591 0.1137 0.1062 0.3726 0.3480
2025-26 Univ. of Regina USports-M 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0959 0.0986 0.5329 0.5479
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 17 0 5 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Augsburg
+169.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16254
Defenseman overall
#2970
Defenseman born in 2003

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2014-15
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Simpson
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Sloan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.