IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Roepke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Houston Bulls NAHL 52 2 12 14 0.269 0.0989 0.0989 0.2841 0.2841
2021-22 Houston Bulls NAHL 30 1 5 6 0.200 0.0735 0.0730 — —
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 21 2 15 17 0.809 0.3300 0.3127 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 26 4 9 13 0.500
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 25 4 6 10 0.400
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 26 3 16 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2023-24 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+240.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3803
Defenseman overall
#984
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.