← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Delano USHS-MN 27 12 9 21 0.778 0.0958 0.0958 0.1889 0.1889
2020-21 Delano USHS-MN 23 6 5 11 0.478 0.0589 0.0589 0.1162 0.1162
2021-22 Delano USHS-MN 28 17 19 36 1.286 0.1584 0.1584 0.3123 0.3123
2022-23 Delano USHS-MN 28 21 20 41 1.464 0.1804 0.1804 0.3557 0.3557
2023-24 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 26 5 12 17 0.654 0.1259 0.1268 0.4120 0.4148
2024-25 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 38 18 28 46 1.210 0.2330 0.2218 0.7629 0.7262
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 14 3 6 9 0.643
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2025-26 · Lake Forest
+308.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24933
Forward overall
#1398
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2001-02
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2012-13
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.