← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trip Pendy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 23 0 4 4 0.174 0.0670 0.0677 0.2531 0.2558
2024-25 Coquitlam Express BCHL 54 7 25 32 0.593 0.2283 0.2193 0.8624 0.8284
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39069
Forward overall
#2454
Forward born in 2005
#2208
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.