IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sy Nutkevitch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-01-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Cornwall Colts CCHL 60 26 31 57 0.950 0.2711 0.2578 0.7354 0.6994
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SR 26 9 31 40 1.538
2010-11 SUNY Potsdam D3 — JR 23 5 15 20 0.870
2009-10 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 25 5 16 21 0.840
2008-09 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 25 7 15 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2008-09 · SUNY Potsdam
+298.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12675
Forward overall
#571
Forward born in 1988
#266
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

P.A. Martineau
Hobart · 2016-17
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Beatty
Endicott · 2018-19
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tory Allan
Norwich · 2008-09
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.