IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

TJ Richey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 43 1 2 3 0.070 0.0256 0.0269 0.0737 0.0773
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 2 8 10 0.294
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 2 8 10 0.294
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 2 8 10 0.294
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 2 8 10 0.294
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 2 8 10 0.294
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 2 8 10 0.294

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30054
Defenseman overall
#4466
Defenseman born in 2005
#6956
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Toomey
Assumption · 2023-24
0.433 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Campbell
Nichols · 2012-13
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Faulkner
Aurora · 2014-15
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.