IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Maller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-04-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Tri-City Storm USHL 39 3 6 9 0.231 0.1470 0.1541 0.6916 0.7250
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 61 1 4 5 0.082 0.0522 0.0519 0.2457 0.2445
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2015-16 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2014-15 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 22 0 2 2 0.091
2013-14 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 20 0 3 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2013-14 · New Hampshire
+71.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13553
Defenseman overall
#1678
Defenseman born in 1994
#4002
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Arias
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cashen Naeve
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Gnos
Saint John's · 2019-20
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.