IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Gagnon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-28 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Rivier
MASCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 48 2 8 10 0.208 0.0849 0.0853 0.1667 0.1674
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21761
Defenseman overall
#3498
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Rivier Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brayden Deschamps
0.42
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Mike Caparco
0.00
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Brady Bomal
0.18
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Jacob Bodin
0.20
actual FR PPG at Rivier

D2/3 Comparables

Connor McAleer
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Bennett
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie Spellman
Endicott · 2014-15
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.