IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frankie Spellman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 52 7 8 15 0.288 0.1060 0.1111 0.3045 0.3191
2014-15 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 56 13 13 26 0.464 0.1557 0.1525 0.4297 0.4208
2015-16 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 54 16 19 35 0.648 0.2381 0.2265 0.6841 0.6509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 16 1 0 1 0.062
2018-19 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 17 1 3 4 0.235
2017-18 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 17 1 9 10 0.588
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE — 22 1 7 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2016-17 · Endicott
+115.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29349
Forward overall
#1153
Forward born in 1995
#2617
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kullan Daikawa
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Johnson
Salem State · 2003-04
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Robbins
Hobart · 2011-12
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.