← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reilly Funk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-12-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Portage Terriers MJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Portage Terriers MJHL 20 2 4 6 0.300 0.0816 0.0908 0.1891 0.2103
2018-19 Portage Terriers MJHL 51 18 35 53 1.039 0.2826 0.2988 0.6549 0.6925
2019-20 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 48 8 15 23 0.479 0.2946 0.2946 1.4118 1.4118
2020-21 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 32 10 7 17 0.531 0.3265 0.3265 1.5650 1.5650
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 36 12 8 20 0.556
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA 36 7 16 23 0.639
2023-24 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA GR 17 2 2 4 0.235
2022-23 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SR 23 1 6 7 0.304
2021-22 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA JR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15089
Forward overall
#629
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2013-14
0.688 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2004-05
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.