← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Jones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-02-22 Country: Canada
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 28 2 10 12 0.429 0.0849 0.0849 0.1953 0.1953
2023-24 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 27 3 17 20 0.741 0.1467 0.1467 0.3375 0.3375
2024-25 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 53 3 24 27 0.509 0.1872 0.1842 0.5377 0.5292
2025-26 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 31 4 35 39 1.258 0.4622 0.4321 1.3279 1.2415
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1915
Defenseman overall
#410
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2017-18
0.63
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
BCHL 2014-15
0.35
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.