IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Farny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-06-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 54 4 23 27 0.500 0.1926 0.1983 0.7277 0.7491
2014-15 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 53 14 35 49 0.924 0.3562 0.3501 1.3454 1.3222
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 41 0 7 7 0.171
2017-18 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 37 1 7 8 0.216
2016-17 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 36 0 3 3 0.083
2015-16 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 34 3 9 12 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2015-16 · Colorado College
+29.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3708
Defenseman overall
#690
Defenseman born in 1995
#810
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Joy
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Karim Gayfullin
Curry · 2022-23
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Mania
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.