← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Mania Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Jersey 87's EHLP 5 3 1 4 0.800 0.0626 0.0626 0.1806 0.1807
2018-19 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 37 11 32 43 1.162 0.2494 0.2516 0.5691 0.5741
2019-20 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 43 29 52 81 1.884 0.2535 0.2535 0.6412 0.6412
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 GR 14 2 7 9 0.643
2023-24 UMass Dartmouth D3 SR 12 1 4 5 0.417
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 JR 26 10 8 18 0.692
2021-22 UMass Dartmouth D3 SO 22 8 6 14 0.636
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 3 1 1 2 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2020-21 · UMass Dartmouth
+342.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14412
Forward overall
#512
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Bentley (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2004-05
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.