IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Leevi Kervinen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-03 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 East Coast Minutemen NA3HL 41 15 21 36 0.878 0.1102 0.1196 0.2772 0.3008
2017-18 Cape Cod Islanders NA3HL 46 28 14 42 0.913 0.1146 0.1185 0.2882 0.2981
2018-19 Cape Cod Islanders NA3HL 37 26 27 53 1.432 0.1798 0.1765 0.4522 0.4439
2019-20 New England Knights NA3HL 44 14 25 39 0.886 0.1112 0.1112 0.2798 0.2798
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22050
Forward overall
#1088
Forward born in 1999
#519
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Colford
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Lavery
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2023-24
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Isaac Grondin
Southern Maine · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.