Tim Lovell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-08 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2018-19	Northeast Generals	NAHL	7	0	3	3	0.429	0.1698	0.1918	0.4500	0.5082
2019-20	—	USHL	31	5	12	17	0.548	0.3371	0.3371	1.6157	1.6157
2024-25	Jukurit	Liiga	6	1	1	2	0.333	0.8332	0.9925	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2024-25	Michigan	D1	BigTen	—	10	0	2	2	0.200
2023-24	Arizona State	D1	NCHC	JR	36	5	32	37	1.028
2022-23	Arizona State	D1	NCHC	SO	31	3	15	18	0.581
2021-22	Arizona State	D1	—	FR	34	4	18	22	0.647
2020-21	Boston College	D1	HockeyEast	—	18	0	2	2	0.111

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.18

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.11

2020-21 · Boston College

-38.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

95%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2448

Defenseman overall

#623

Defenseman born in 2002

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Favaro

Curry · 2014-15

0.500 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

Jory McWilliams

Bethel · 2014-15

0.000 No data

actual D2/3 PPG

Jack Kelly

St. Norbert · 2013-14

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.