← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Doran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 43 3 4 7 0.163 0.0960 0.0960 0.4890 0.4890
2020-21 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 22 1 3 4 0.182 0.1072 0.1072 0.5460 0.5460
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 62 13 17 30 0.484 0.2855 0.2836 1.4533 1.4437
2022-23 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 58 13 21 34 0.586 0.3458 0.3255 1.7606 1.6574
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 36 7 24 31 0.861
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 36 10 12 22 0.611
2023-24 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2023-24 · Bowling Green
+51.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17633
Forward overall
#881
Forward born in 2003
#1715
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2009-10
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.