← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Chabrier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 39 1 4 5 0.128 0.0788 0.0788 0.3777 0.3777
2020-21 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 42 2 8 10 0.238 0.1464 0.1464 0.7015 0.7015
2021-22 USHL 52 4 14 18 0.346 0.2128 0.2049 1.0200 0.9821
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 31 0 12 12 0.387
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 37 0 10 10 0.270
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 37 6 16 22 0.595
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 28 1 4 5 0.179
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2022-23 · Maine
-7.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9583
Defenseman overall
#2083
Defenseman born in 2002
#3200
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2005-06
1.346 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.