| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 59 | 27 | 38 | 65 | 1.102 | 0.4245 | 0.4633 | 1.6009 | 1.7471 |
| 2001-02 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 67 | 41 | 44 | 85 | 1.269 | 0.4888 | 0.5065 | 1.8435 | 1.9102 |
| 2002-03 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 53 | 46 | 51 | 97 | 1.830 | 0.7052 | 0.7002 | 2.6595 | 2.6407 |
| 2003-04 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 59 | 62 | 53 | 115 | 1.949 | 0.7510 | 0.7123 | 2.8324 | 2.6863 |
| 2014-15 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 50 | 11 | 21 | 32 | 0.640 | 1.6000 | 1.3892 | 5.4259 | 4.7110 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Alaska Fairbanks | D1 | WCHA | SO | 39 | 8 | 19 | 27 | 0.692 |
| 2004-05 | Alaska Fairbanks | D1 | WCHA | FR | 37 | 12 | 20 | 32 | 0.865 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.